As a follow up to my last post, “You just don’t get it.“, I saw this article today in Newsweek that has an interesting take on why congress doesn’t work. The fact that we have senators resigning because they feel that cross party feuding is preventing forward progress should serve as a wake up call to all congressional incumbents and hopefuls.
I’ve become increasingly frustrated lately with the state of politics in our nation (my nation, that is – the United States). It isn’t any one policy, program, or agenda that has me annoyed. While I do see both good and bad in healthcare reform, I’m not all that upset about it. I’m nervous about national debt but can handle it.
What I am finding myself growing more sick of each day is the constant fighting between the major political parties. These are the people that are supposed to be looking out for the well being of us, not themselves or their political parties. Instead there is a constant stream of rhetoric from all directions.
Some would argue that by being elected the views of the candidate effectively mimic the views of their region. However, this argument fails to recognize that the majority of elections are decided by a relatively thin margin. This means that the candidate could, at most, represent the total thoughts and desires of just over half of all constituents.
At a Tea Party rally Sarah Palin recently said, “Washington has broken faith with the people that they are to be serving”. She’s absolutely right – and she is part of the problem. Instead of focusing on roasting political adversaries our elected officials need to focus on fixing the problems. This applies to everyone, republicans, democrats, independents, etc.
If each official used their finger pointing energy to help solve problems our country would be much better off as a result. Bipartisan doesn’t mean split or whole – it means cooperative.
The final Consumer Price Index (CPI) data is out for 2008 and we can now analyze the total inflation throughout 2008 and the projected impact of this on our economy. Let’s start with the numbers.
Average month to month change in 2008:
| National CPI | Southeast CPI | National ? | Southeast ? | |
| 12/2007 | 210.036 | 203.457 | ||
| 01/2008 | 211.080 | 204.510 | 1.044 | 1.053 |
| 02/2008 | 211.693 | 205.060 | 0.613 | 0.550 |
| 03/2008 | 213.528 | 206.676 | 1.835 | 1.616 |
| 04/2008 | 214.823 | 208.085 | 1.295 | 1.409 |
| 05/2008 | 216.632 | 210.006 | 1.809 | 1.921 |
| 06/2008 | 218.815 | 212.324 | 2.183 | 2.318 |
| 07/2008 | 219.964 | 213.304 | 1.149 | 0.980 |
| 08/2008 | 219.086 | 212.387 | (0.878) | (0.917) |
| 09/2008 | 218.783 | 212.650 | (0.303) | 0.263 |
| 10/2008 | 216.573 | 210.108 | (2.210) | (2.542) |
| 11/2008 | 212.426 | 205.559 | (4.148) | (4.549) |
| 12/2008 | 210.228 | 203.501 | (2.197) | (2.058) |
| Average | 0.016 | 0.004 | ||
The inflation so far for 2008:
Southeast = [ ( 203.501 - 203.457 ) / 203.457 ] * 100 = 0.022%
National = [ ( 210.228 - 210.036 ) / 210.036 ] * 100 = 0.091%
Great, right? Not so fast…
I don’t want to start spouting doom and gloom but there are caveats to such flat growth.
Inaccurate CPI Data
In 1995 the government very discretely changed how the CPI is calculated. The basic concept is that the old style of gathering CPI data looked at the basic cost of goods in a consumer “basket”. This means that the cost of bread, electricity, housing, etc., is compared over time to see what the differences are. Prior to 1995 this was a one to one comparison – a loaf of rye bread was compared with a loaf of rye bread. However, with the changes in 1995, the government is now taking substitutions into account. The basic idea is that if the cost of a loaf of rye bread goes too high consumers will shift preferences and buy a loaf of white bread instead. Because of this, the shift does not accurately take into account the true inflation. This is easily explained in an example.
In January 2008 a loaf of white bread is $2.25 and a loaf of rye bread is $2.42. In February 2008 the same loaf of white bread has jumped to $3.14 and the same loaf of rye bread has jumped to $3.89. The government, specifically the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), takes a look at this and decides that people are unlikely to pay a 38% price increase for the loaf of rye bread and decide to use a cheaper substitute, the loaf of white bread, feeling that it is a more accurate depiction of consumer behavior. Despite the fact that both white bread and rye bread suffered a large increase, the BLS only records a jump of 23%, the difference between the 1/08 price of rye bread and the 2/08 price of white bread. In the old system of CPI calculations they would have recorded a 37% increase, the difference between the 1/08 and 2/08 price of rye bread. This means that the BLS has just artificially lowered rye bread inflation by 14%.
Another stunning example of this is that the BLS chose, in 1983, to stop paying attention to the price of home ownership and instead focus on rental prices. This means that while the price of homes were artificially inflating, they were not being factored into the CPI, which is the primary means by which The Fed monitors the economy and takes adjusting actions, such as lowering or raising interest rates. In addition, the average rental prices “actually declined by a few points”, according to Dollars & Sense magazine. This means that while home prices skyrocketed the decreasing prices in rental properties caused the CPI to artificially drop.
This is clearly inaccurate and leads to artificially low numbers. John Williams, of Newsweek, estimates that today’s CPI figures could be under by around 7%. This means that, if measured accurately, the actual inflation for 2008 COULD be as high as 7.022% for the Southeast and 7.091% nationally. If we suddenly find ourselves in a state of deflation, we now have no way of knowing whether we are actually in a deflationary period or if government tinkering has skewed our view of the data and is shielding the fact that we are actually inflating.
Impending Deflation
Let’s say we ignore the inaccuracies in the CPI we just went through. We are good now, right? Maybe.
What is concerning is NOT that we are very, very close to an equilibrium state but that the annual trend just happened to put us at this equalibrium by the end of 2008. The year started off with inflation rising, which it continued to do until around June, when it started tapering off. Since June it is been constantly dropping, to the point where we have arrived back at our coveted equalibrium state of near zero. The problem with this is that if the trend continues we will very soon find ourselves in a state of deflation, which historically leads to rampant production cuts, job loss, and opens the door further for a depression. What we really want and need is small but steady inflation – somewhere between 1-3. But who knows, with the way the BLS is reporting CPI data, maybe we have actually been inflating this entire time.
If you want more explanation of how I arrive at these numbers visit the May 2008 post.
For information on why I am including the December 2007 numbers in these calculations see the June 2008 post.
